It is surprising the person who has been director in Tata Sons for ten years and Chairman for last four years, said nothing with what he is now trying to damage. Tata sons is private Ltd company and it is well with in right of any pvt company board to replace an incompetent or otherwise, Chairman in their view, only with majority. Here it was case that none supported the out going Chairman. . He has not been removed from chairman of any listed company where share holder has right for information. Share holders of listed companies are not share holders of Tata Sons so they don't have any right to question permoter company. More over Mistry has not shown good leadership but just trying to sell assets which even any third grade leader can do. To create new assets, new business, to increase market share and to turn around sick asstets should be focus of a first class leader. Ratan Tata imagination of 1 lac car has taken world by surprise. Even in Japan, where I have been for long training at that time , sponsered by CII, that includes Toyta, Mitusbishi and many more Top rated companies, many top engineers has all praise for Tata for even thinking of making small cost Car and many of Japanese engineers were motivated to take big cost control project.He motivated engineers around globe to think about bottom of pyramid during desgin, which resulted into lot of low cost but useful products which were out of reach of people belonging to bottom of pyramid. We should not just focus that car did not do financialy, which in my view was result of poor marketing. Mistry should avoid damaging Tata group further as this is hurting share holders and will only result into further justifying his replacement with many share holders of Tata companies like me thinking that why Tata took four years to replace a person like him, who don't think once what will be result of his fight to small share holders of group compnies.In my view Mistri has provided an opportunity to small investers to invest in group at discount.