Why operational cashflow is (CFO) nothing compared to the profits
CFO is very negligible compared to profits. WC is very high (us it a red flag or normal?).please some one clarify
Why operational cashflow is (CFO) nothing compared to the profits
CFO is very negligible compared to profits. WC is very high (us it a red flag or normal?).please some one clarify
Thanks for taking the time for such a detailed reply. I am also a part time investor like you.
I agree not to follow herd mentality of retail, but we should still keep tracking what companies/sectors FII/DII are buying on a monthly/quarterly basis. That can help us in sectoral rotation.
Uday Kotak – For building a reliable brand, clean image, risk management and vision for the future.
Correct
It depends on the various prices at which such equity capital has been raised. For instance IDFC First raised around Rs 2,196 crores by issuing around 37.75 crores of shares @ 58.18 per share in March 2023. On Oct 6, it raised Rs 3,000 crores by issuing about 10% fewer shares – 33.24 cr @ 90.25 per share.
I had worked out (my post above) that y-o-y PAT growth had been 18.4%, EPS growth was much lower at 4.47%. I calculated EPS on Issued shares, but the company has substantial exercisable options that would dilute EPS further
q2 fy24 (edited and added some data points).pdf (2.6 MB)
q2 notes with some data points from DRHP
Sorry for the late reply. Was a bit busy.
1 – Yes. Sector rotation can give a better CAGR than simple long-term compounding with fewer transactions. But as I have said, THESE ARE MY PERSONAL OPINIONS. And I am ‘not that smart’ to analyse and know which sectors will turn around. And waiting on the sidelines means not investing any fresh capital. The study of businesses is a continuous ongoing process in the background. And conviction is not a BLIND one. Long-term doesn’t mean you don’t track the businesses. The days of buying it and forgetting it are gone. You need to analyse each and every one of your businesses quarterly.
2 – Nowadays, it’s very difficult to differentiate between noise and knowledge on SM. We don’t know other people’s incentives. Yes. I know with a few technical indicators like RSI, etc., we can determine which sectors are trending. But again, you have to be on your toes to do it. One important point to remember is that – Retail investors are different from asset managers. At least I am investing along with my private medical practice. Asset managers are under pressure to perform every quarter ( which we retail investors don’t have to). Recently, I have reduced following everyone who is in asset managing/advisory, etc services. They have their own incentives. Nowadays, I try to follow individual investors who don’t have such incentives.
3 – It takes time to know whom to follow and whom to avoid. I am still learning that after three years of investing. Yes. For us retail investors, developing your own ideas is nearly impossible. We must depend on social media and prominent authorities for the stock names. But here, we have to avoid the HERD MENTALITY and AUTHORITY BIAS. Mohnish Pabrai is a huge proponent of ‘CLONING’. However, the stock ideas that you get from your authorities are only the first step in the stock filtration process. Then, you have to apply your own criteria for investing in them.
6 – I am slightly biased here as I have gotten excellent returns from SIP investing in PPFAS since its inception in 2013. YES. This looks like a good strategy to increase your SIP amount in, say, a kind of bear market and reduce it in a bull market.
But overall, your points are pretty much valid, provided you are a full-time investor.
For a part-time retail investor like me, it’s impossible to analyse and predict future trends and invest accordingly. At least, I am not that smart.
dr.vikas
the route for their majority export that is china is different orignating from bay of bengal although some impact on japan(8% of export revenue) going from red sea route can be there
source of info: DRHP
Even if they grow profitability at 20℅, EPS growth would be below it due to equity dilution. Isn’t it? For example, if the bank raises Rs 5,000 crore of equity capital and the profit grows at a CAGR of 20%, the EPS growth would be around 16%.
Is it a right assumption or am I missing something?
In the prevailing scenario, characterized by a widespread increase in provisions across the banking sector, it is imperative to acknowledge that a diminished margin of safety persists concerning asset quality or non-performing assets (NPA) for virtually all banks.
Taking a lighthearted perspective, it becomes apparent that short-term challenges are nearly unavoidable. In such a context, it would be judicious to regard five-year projections as aspirational, recognizing the dynamic nature of the current scenario.
Bro, did this tentative case hearing heard on 22 Jan?
EvoLve theme by Theme4Press • Powered by WordPress & Rakesh Jhunjhunwala Latest Stock Market News
The Most Valuable Commodity Is Information!