I liked your sarcasm and so liked your post.
You could have thought that it was a typo as I was also referring to “FY 16” in the same sentence so instead of taking the gist of what I was saying, you chose otherwise and use terms like ‘reverse discounting’ which I actually do not understand as much as you would. In my opinion, what you missed in my post is ‘broader picture’, in lighter vein.
You put your opinion on PEG and hence on the valuations and I respect that as every one is entitled to have his/her as I did mine.
Anyway, thanks for taking time to reply to my post.
| Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter |
