In case of a name like MTAR or any name that is engaged in cutting edge or state of the art or even breakthrough tech/research, its almost a good idea to just find something that they do is, with a guarantee, suitable to a big market – like ability to produce and sell products at a low cost. This bases everything in reality, and if they have got one such thing down ? they can build on that. Tesla made CARS a success first, then indulged in other things they do. For now MTAR has the Bloom bit going for it, would be better if it is able to make a solid offering for the whole market or do something to make one of its offerings “super sticky”.
Company’s 100% offerings should not be based in expectations or speculations. That’s a real risk.
Edited to make this Addition :
That’s a real risk as it makes the company a perpetually “in the future” one. Something has to work in present times, and work with good degree of success. Or else, it becomes difficult to make sense of it, it might go up in value, but one will never know what exactly is making it happen.
There are many “in the future” companies, and a big sub-category is made up by start-ups ; “when this happens, then this will kick into place and finally we will achieve this…” then it corrects from 2000 to 150…
Hope that gets my point across.
Would like to understand what that at-present-sticky product is.
| Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter |
