Why one stock is 41% in the PF? Considering that it has given negative return, it is the not the case of allocation getting doubled or tripled, or you had been averaging up, so the stock occupies 41% now, which was not the case before?
Do you also have an equity MF PF, so the direct equity PF is small compared to this, so 41% is not big compared to your overall equity?
| Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter |
