While making these comparisons and drawing conclusions, can we look at:
- Reasonable time frames, say 5 years, for analysis to account for shock events, cycles etc. I see some with 3 or 2 years and that comparison with a 20 year track does not seem logical.
- Can we also try and see growth in the PAT ratio CAGR for 5 year periods and see if that gives additional insights? Say a 20 year track will give us 19 5 year PAT multiples.
- Like Donald has hinted, scalability is definitely affected by size, inversely. So, bucketing by sizes does make better sense.
- How do we eliminate effects of regulatory change or shock events so that we can actually examine operational excellence which will be long term?
Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter |