“Constituent assembly while drafting it decided that…the legislature cannot change” the status of Article 370, senior advocate Kapil Sibal argued on behalf of the petitioners. “That is the element of permanency,” he added. The “political act of abrogation of Article 370 was to achieve some political objective de hors the provision of law”, he argued, adding that it was a “mosaic of illegalities”.
Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter |