@Mayank_Bajpai – Indeed, Bard might not always be perfectly accurate as it’s still in the process of being refined for production-grade quality. I’ve been considering various alternatives that might be beneficial for your needs.
You have a few options to consider, with the first three being free and the fourth being a paid solution:
-
Utilize a screen capture tool to capture the result’s contents and then paste them into ChatGPT. While this isn’t the most optimal solution, it can serve as a workaround when needed.
-
Explore Claude, an alternative to both Bard and ChatGPT. Claude offers the unique feature of attaching documents as context. This means you can provide Claude with a results document or annual reports to read and process before generating a response. By simply dragging and dropping the document into the chat window, Claude processes it and makes it available for reference. This enhanced context can lead to more accurate and informative responses, useful for tasks such as summarization, answering questions, and generating creative content. Claude is currently available in beta to users in the United States and the United Kingdom, and may be accessible via VPN. Anthropic, the creator of Claude, plans to expand its availability to more users in the future.
-
Utilize Google Drive, which supports using PDFs as context for generative AI. You can upload a PDF file of results or annual report to Google Drive, open it in Google Docs or Google Slides, and then click the “Generate” button in the toolbar. This will prompt Bard to generate text based on the PDF’s content. You can also use the “Open with” menu in Google Drive to employ third-party generative AI models like ChatGPT or Claude.
-
If you’re willing to invest financially, ChatGPT Plus offers access to live internet data (as per reports). This subscription service costs $20 per month and could potentially enhance your experience.
I hope these alternatives prove helpful for your requirements!
| Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter |
