That may defeat the purpose of high allocation for others, because limited downsize does not guarantee superior returns, which are the reason for allocating more. I bet because I know that the high returns along with the high capital will make meaningful change to the PF. Yes, I do agree that when allocating big, no loss is also good, but I am not sure if all prefer that.
And even people who bet big, may not go in all at once, but gradually build positions, as and when what they have envisaged is happening, they average up. Of course some may average down because of their conviction, many ways to skin the cat, as we know.
Once can allocate 25% of the PF to ITC or TCS, the chance of losing is less, there could be some loss of course, but who would want to make high allocation to such stocks. Over the course of years, if not sold, from the initial position to the current holding, stocks may occupy 25% of the PF, that is a different story.
My limited point is that, there are different schools of thought for betting big, different perspectives.
Just my 2 cents.
| Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter |
