Apologies for the double post, but I am struggling to find an acceptable answer to this question. With due respect to what PhantomFX is doing, the disparity in prestige and legacy between the two companies is striking, raising doubts about the logic behind the acquisition. Tippett Studio is one of the most prestigious boutique studios in Hollywood, operating exclusively at the highest end of the industry. It is obvious that they were struggling financially and possibly wanted new leadership. However, given their reputation, they would have garnered considerable interest from numerous other studios or boutique houses, making the decision to sell to PhantomFX puzzling. PhantomFX may provide a cheaper workforce to increase margin, but that does not justify selling the company because they could have simply outsourced some of their work without compromising independence. In any case, working under the leadership of a significantly less illustrious company risks diluting their brand and creative autonomy, an unfortunate outcome for such a distinguished entity.
From PhantomFX’s perspective, this may seem like an incredible opportunity, but the adage “if it’s too good to be true, it probably is” comes to mind. I am concerned that there must be something seriously wrong with Tippett Studio or they know something which we don’t e.g. major industry downturn. Acquisitions like this rarely end happily. In hindsight, I really wish that they had pursued a less prestigious acquisition target.
I am contemplating reducing or exiting my position in PhantomFX. Also, I am not a financial advisor.
| Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter |
