IMO among two verticals, GIS is what it is and the other one is everything else. If we try hard, we can imagine all kinds of synergies between GIS and stuff in “everything else”. In reality, it may not make a huge difference. Even if it does, one should not give any weight to it in the valuation exercise. At least for now.
From ER&D to data centre consultation, they are perhaps trying to incubate some ideas for potential future verticals.
In ten years it may start looking like any other IT service company (minus BFSI et al) where Geo has highest weightage but has few other streams.
If I were to question one thing, it would be does company has a clear mission other than “dekhi jayegi”.
| Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter |
