Seth Klarman on the Painful Decision to Hold Cash

Discussion in 'Must-Read Interviews, Articles & News Items' started by Vidhi Khanna, Apr 1, 2015.

  1. Vidhi Khanna

    Vidhi Khanna Active Member Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2015
    Messages:
    579
    Likes Received:
    55
    ........

    Betting that the markets never revert to historical norms, that we are in a new era of higher securities prices and lower returns, involves the risk of significant capital impairment. Betting that prices will fall at some point involves opportunity cost of uncertain amount. By holding expensive securities with low prospective returns, people choose to risk actual loss. We prefer the risk of lost opportunity to that of lost capital, and agree wholeheartedly with the sentiment espoused by respected value investor Jean-Marie Eveillard, when he said, “I would rather lose half our shareholders. . . than lose half of our shareholders’ money….”

    Some argue that holding significant cash is gambling, that being less than fully invested is akin to market timing. But isn’t a yes or no decision the crucial one in investing? Where does it say that investing means always buying something, even the best of a bad lot? An investor who can’t or won’t say no forgoes perhaps the most valuable tool available to investors. Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett’s long-time partner, has counseled investors, “Look for more value in terms of discounted future cash flow than you’re paying for. Move only when you have an advantage. It’s very basic. You have to understand the odds and have the discipline to bet only when the odds are in your favor.”

    https://www.grahamanddoddsville.net/wordpress/Files/Gurus/Seth%20Klarman/Seth%2520Klarman%2520on%2520Cash.pdf
     
Loading...