September 18, 2025
Nithin Kamath Zerodha
While investors are cheering the widespread adoption of zero-brokerage, Nithin Kamath, the pioneer of the model in India, has sent the chilling warning that it will spell doom for the entire sector and lead to disaster for all concerned
While investors are cheering the widespread adoption of zero-brokerage, Nithin Kamath, the pioneer of the model in India, has sent the chilling warning that it will spell doom for the entire sector and lead to disaster for all concerned




US Brokerages lose $15 Billion of M-Cap

Hitherto, large brokerages in the USA like Interactive Brokers, Charles Schwab, TD Ameritrade, E-Trade, etc were dismissive of the threat posed by Robinhood.

They were merrily ripping off their clients by charging as much as $7 (Rs. 525) per trade.

This led to the brokerages earning mind-boggling revenues of as much as $1.9 Billion (Rs. 15000 crore) each from hapless investors.

However, they grossly underestimated the abilities of Robinhood’s founders, Baiju Bhatt (an Indian) and Vladimir Tenev.

The duo offered the same services as the large brokers but at zero cost.

Naturally, all investors jumped ship. They migrated in droves from the big brokerages to Robinhood.

Interactive Brokers was the first to buckle under pressure.

A few days ago, it introduced a “lite” plan under it which charges no brokerage.

The other brokerages had no option. They also fell in line and reduced the brokerage to zero.

Steve Sosnick, the Chief Strategist of Interactive Brokers, struggled to keep a brave face when asked why his firm slashed the brokerage.

This has been building. This is the inevitable result,” he said, his shoulders slumped.

Naturally, the move proved catastrophic for the brokerage stocks. They tanked and lost a colossal fortune of $15 Billion in market capitalization in the course of a few days.





The race to Zero – Can the Indian brokerage industry survive?

Nobody knows the discount brokerage industry better than Nithin Kamath, the Billionaire visionary co-founder of Zerodha.

The action of the US brokerage industry of collectively slashing brokerage has not gone down well with him.

If this race does catch up in India, it will be a certain end for traditional brokers who rely mainly on retail broking for revenue, especially with the new limitation around margin funding,” he has said in a grim tone.

He has explained that the US brokerages will be able to survive despite the onslaught of the 0-commission because they have multiple other streams of income such as (i) interest on idle balances of customers, (ii) selling order flow to HFT (high frequency traders), (iii) lending of securities from the customers’ Demat accounts, (iv) advisory services etc.

These items of income contribute several billions of dollars to the broker’s kitty.

However, Indian brokerages are not entitled to most of these privileges.

Under SEBI’s rules, idle balances have to be returned to the client and the order flow cannot be sold to third parties.

Brokerages are presently able to eke out a living by offering advisory services to clients.

However, SEBI is taking a dim view of the issue on the ground that there is a conflict of interest between the broker and his client.

The broker tries to peddle those products on which he earns the highest commission.

SEBI is accordingly encouraging the growth of Registered Investment Advisers (RIA).

If SEBI decides to prohibit brokers from offering advisory services, it will be the “final nail in the coffin,” Nithin Kamath says.

The day SEBI comes up with a regulation that disallows brokerage firms to advice and place trades on behalf of customers, that would be the final nail in the coffin for the traditional brokerage industry. Most old school firms today survive only because they are being run as a quasi wealth-management firm using a brokerage license.

I think if all brokerage firms in India like in the US did start dropping the price to 0, the industry in its current form will not be able to survive,” he has added.

Will Zerodha’s own valuations shrink if the big guns also offer zero-brokerage?

One aspect that it is not spelt out in Nithin Kamath’s analysis but which is implicit is that Zerodha will itself also be a victim of the zero-brokerage syndrome.

Presently, Zerodha is the market leader in the discount brokerage business and commands a lions’ share.

However, if heavy weights like Motilal Oswal, ICICI Securities, Angel Broking, HDFC Securities, Kotak Securities etc, etc muscle their way into the field, Zerodha will obviously lose its dominance.

Naturally, this will affect its own valuations and adversely affect plans to go public via an IPO in the near future.



PayTM may turn things around – give investors commission to buy stocks

PayTM became famous for offering customers generous “cash backs” to route business through its platform.

We shouldn’t be surprised if PayTM, in its capacity as broker, offers incentives to investors to buy and sell stocks through it.





Should we dump brokerage stocks?

It goes without saying that the brokerage business is now a sunset industry.

It is hard to believe that at one time in the past, some of these stocks like Emkay Global were the hot favourite of Dolly Khanna and Porinju Veliyath.

However, all of those days are in the past.

Presently, stocks of leading brokerages like Motilal Oswal, Edelweiss, Emkay Global, Geojit, Dolat Investment, AB Money, LKP Securities etc are languishing at their 52-week lows.

So, if we are invested in any of these stocks, we should dump them ASAP and bolt before the contagion spreads!








8 thoughts on “It Will Be Disaster If All Brokerages Adopt Zero-Brokerage Model: Nithin Kamath Of Zerodha

  1. Zero Brokerage , yes, will be disaster : More for investors and less for brokerages.
    Nil Transaction Cost will tempt traders to trade more & more. It will also influence Passive Investors to become Active traders and market Volatility will blow their capital.
    What is success rate or survival rate of active F&O traders….. very few traders survive the market volatility. So the Concept of Zero Commission is to make everyone a trader and that’s going to hurt in long term. Investors / traders will avoid capital markets.

  2. Nehle pe dehla , even discount brokerage is disaster for brokers, now it’s discount brokers turn to face what they have started.

  3. This info is incorrect. Zerodha takes money in different forms. Their kite app is charged and they charge extra hidden costs after 1-3 months.

  4. Zerodha apprehend because other may take over its customers nothing else. Rather I would say flow of money will be there in market and awareness plays an important role for new investors.

  5. Actually Zero brokerage has a bigger cost to clients.
    1 Zerodha requires upfront money in account to make delivery trade. So even if a trade does not go through, amount remains in the account earning interest to zerodha for the many days.
    2. Even if the trade goes through, other brokerages require money only on T+2 day which can be more if there are trading holidays which happens every saturday and sunday.
    3. Most clients let their money sit in account rather than withdraw as there is withdrawal charge.
    4. I have found that a broker with 0.10% brokerage is cheaper than Zerodha.

    1. hi Gitesh , 1)would u please explain your 4th point , how a broker with 0.10% brokerage cheaper than zerodha ( a zero brokerage)?
      2) are our stocks safe in zerobrokerage account?

Leave a Reply to Dilip d b Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *